4.4 Article

Partial ordering of life cycle inventory databases

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 1673-1683

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0972-x

Keywords

LCI database management; Inventory modeling; Foreground; Background; Partial ordering; Cyclic dependency; Graph theory

Funding

  1. California Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) [DRR-13026]
  2. National Science Foundation [1442966]
  3. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  4. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1442966] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Life cycle inventory (LCI) databases provide information of fundamental importance to the mainstream practice of life cycle assessment (LCA). Development and management of LCI data resources is a tremendous task. This paper seeks to develop design principles for organizing efforts around distributed database management by considering the structure of inventory networks. A number of LCI databases in wide use are placed into a partial ordering using graph theoretic techniques. First, strongly connected components, which indicate cyclic dependencies, are identified in each network. Then, those components are collapsed to single nodes, rendering the graphs acyclic. The acyclic graphs are then ordered topologically. Large databases were found to contain a single large strongly connected component, designated the background, that satisfied dependencies of other processes in the database. Processes with a lower position in the ordering than the background, designated the foreground, depended on inputs from the background in order to operate, but no background processes required inputs from any foreground processes. Processes higher in the order than the background, designated the downstream, satisfied dependencies in the background but did not themselves require the background. Databases sharing a common set of product flows could be compared on the basis of their foreground, background, and downstream segments. Making a distinction between an acyclic foreground and a strongly connected background has computational utility because the foreground and background databases can be managed independently. Describing LCA studies on the basis of their dependence on background product flows would allow them to be easily moved among distinct databases that provide the same products and would also facilitate critical review. Background databases themselves can be broken up by scope into mutually dependent systems that can be independently maintained. LCI database maintainers should consider maintaining the foreground and background components of their databases separately because of the differing implications of modeling decisions made in each of the two cases. A framework for database-independent enumeration of intermediate flows would advance distributed data management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available