4.7 Article

A preliminary longitudinal fMRI study of frontal-subcortical circuits in bipolar disorder using a paced motor activation paradigm

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 103, Issue 1-3, Pages 237-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.01.008

Keywords

frontal -subcortical; fMRI; bipolar disorder; striatum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Compelling evidence suggests abnormal functioning of frontal-subcortical (FSC) circuits in bipolar disorder, but it is unknown whether these are state or trait abnormalities. Longitudinal functional neuroimaging studies may help clarify this issue. However, studies to date have not determined which activation paradigms may be most useful for this purpose. A paced motor task has the potential to be more reliable than cognitive or emotional activation paradigms. Methods: To evaluate the utility of a paced motor activation task as a longitudinal probe of FSC function, we conducted fMR1 sca ns of 10 subjects with bipolar I disorder when euthymic. We compared activation patterns to the same subjects who had been previously scanned during an episode of depression. Results: The paced motor task resulted in activation in the bilateral striatum which was consistent across mood states as well as greater activation among the subjects when euthymic in the right anterior cingulate and medial frontal gyrus. Limitations: The study sample was small (10 subjects) which limits general izability of findings. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study of bipolar illness utilizing a paced motor task. These findings suggest that a paced motor task is useful as a longitudinal probe of both state and trait function in bipolar disorder. Further, this study provides preliminary evidence that striatal functional abnormalities may represent a trait characteristic. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available