4.6 Article

Adhesion modeling on rough low linear density polyethylene

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE
Volume 72, Issue 9, Pages E485-E491

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00523.x

Keywords

coating; contact angle; peel strength; peel test; roughness; surface free energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food ashesion is an important attribute that could have both positive negative ramifications depending on the application. Yet, its quantification remains cumbersome and as a consequence adhesion models are scarce. The effect of surface roughness, free energy, and ozone treatment on adhesion on rough low linear density polyethylene films was investigated. Adhesion was measured by a 180 degrees peel strength test. The plastic films were roughened (surface roughness ratio, r, ranged from 1.00 to 1.15). Exposing the film to ozone treatment (0 to 300 s) modified its surface free energy, gamma(s) (32.4 to 37.9 mJ/m(2), respectively), and its polar component of the surface free energy, gamma(p)(s) (3.0 to 8.3 mJ/m(2), respectively). The films were coated with polyurethane capable forming hydrogen bonds. Adhesion was found to be a function of the apparent contact angle of water, theta(ap[water]), surface roughness ratio, and surface free energy. The linear relationship between the apparent contact angle of water theta(ap[water]), and gamma(p)(s) was incorporated in building an empirical model that quantifies peel strength as function of r and gamma(p)(s). The model showed good agreement with experimental data, especially for longer ozone exposures and rough surfaces. The empirical model provides insight into the relationships between surface roughness, surface energy, and adhesion. Qualifying these effects could facilitate reducing biofilm forming on food equipment, antisticking treatments, or easy peel packages, or reducing food residues adhering to the food packages and consequently minimize oxidation, off flavors, and waste.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available