4.7 Article

Cognitive performance among the elderly and dietary fish intake: the Hordaland Health Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages 1470-1478

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1470

Keywords

cognitive deficit; cognition; elderly; fish; fish oils; processed fish; seafood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that cognitive impairment and dementia in older subjects might be influenced by a diet including seafood. Objective: The objective was to examine the cross-sectional relation between intake of different amounts of various seafood (fish and fish products) and cognitive performance. Design: The subjects (n = 2031 subjects, 55% women), aged 70-74 y, were recruited from the general population in Western Norway and underwent cognitive testing. A cognitive test battery included the Kendrick Object Learning Test, Trail Making Test (part A), modified versions of the Digit Symbol Test, Block Design, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test. Poor cognitive performance was defined as a score in the highest decile for the Trail Making Test and in the lowest decile for all other tests. Results: Subjects whose mean daily intake of fish and fish products was >= 10 g/d (n = 195 1) had significantly better mean test scores and a lower prevalence of poor cognitive performance than did those whose intake was < 10 g/d (n = 80). The associations between total intake of seafood and cognition were strongly dose-dependent; the maximum effect was observed at an intake of approximate to 75 g/d. Most cognitive functions were influenced by fish intake. The effect was more pronounced for nonprocessed lean fish and fatty fish. Conclusions: In the elderly, a diet high in fish and fish products is associated with better cognitive performance in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available