4.1 Article

CD14+ monocyte levels in subgroups of acute coronary syndromes

Journal

CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 519-522

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3282ef4e7c

Keywords

C-reactive protein; non-ST elevation myocardial infarction; ST elevation myocardial infarction; toll-like receptors; unstable angina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives We aimed to investigate whether there were any differences in the percentages of CD14(+) monocytes between subgroups of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). CD14 is a monocyte surface receptor that plays a role in the innate immune system. CD14(+) monocytes are associated with complications of atherosclerosis. Methods In total we enrolled 115 patients with ACS: 24 with unstable angina (UA); 29 with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI); and 62 with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The levels of C-reactive protein and percentage of CD14(+) monocyte were measured on admission. Results CD14(+) monocyte percentages were observed to be different between groups by analysis of variance test The percentages of CD14(+) monocyte were 81.24 +/- 10.04% in the UA group; 89.40 5.84% in the NSTEMI group; and 87.22 +/- 11.75% in the STEMI group (P= 0.013). The differences between the UA and the NSTEMI and between the UA and the STEMI groups with Bonferroni posthoc testing were significant (P=0.014 and P=0.049 respectively). Moreover, no significant difference was found between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups (P= 1.000). The C-reactive protein levels in the UA group were detected to be significantly low with Bonferroni posthoc testing compared with both the NSTEMI and STEMI groups (for both comparisons, P<0.002). Conclusions A significant difference in CD14(+) monocyte percentages between subgroups of ACS was determined. CD14(+) monocyte percentages can be a useful parameter in differentiating between the subgroups of ACS, especially between ILIA and myocardial infarction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available