4.4 Article

The Paradox of Enrichment in Metaecosystems

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 184, Issue 6, Pages 752-763

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/678406

Keywords

stability; dispersal; spatial heterogeneity; source-sink dynamics; fertility; alternative stable states

Funding

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  5. NSERC
  6. Canada Research Chair Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paradox of enrichment has been studied almost exclusively within communities or metacommunities, without explicit nutrient dynamics. Yet local recycling of materials from enriched ecosystems may affect the stability of connected ecosystems. Here we study the effect of nutrient, detritus, producer, and consumer spatial flowscombined with changes in regional enrichmenton the stability of a metaecosystem model. We considered both spatially homogeneous and heterogeneous enrichment. We found that nutrient and detritus spatial flows are destabilizing, whereas producer or consumer spatial flows are either neutral or stabilizing. We noticed that detritus spatial flows have only a weak impact on stability. Our study reveals that heterogeneity no longer stabilizes well-connected systems when accounting for explicit representation of nutrient dynamics. We also found that intermediate consumer diffusion could lead to multiple equilibria in strongly enriched metaecosystems. Stability can emerge from a top-down control allowing the storage of materials into inorganic form, a mechanism never documented before. In conclusion, local enrichment can be stabilized if spatial flows are strong enough to efficiently redistribute the local excess of enrichment to unfertile ecosystems. However, high regional enrichment can be dampened only by intermediate consumer diffusion rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available