4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Glucose control, self-care behaviors, and the presence of the chronic care model in primary care clinics

Journal

DIABETES CARE
Volume 30, Issue 11, Pages 2849-2854

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc06-2516

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [K08 HS013008-02] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between AlC and the extent to which care delivered to patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care clinics is consistent with the chronic care model (CCM), after controlling for self-care behaviors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This was a cross-sectional, observational study of care provided to 618 patients with type 2 diabetes across 20 small, autonomous primary care clinics in South Texas. Subjects completed an exit survey. The medical record was abstracted for AlC values. Clinicians completed the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) survey, a validated measure of the extent to which care delivered is consistent with the CCM. RESULTS - There was a significant relationship between ACIC score and AlC, but this relationship varied according to self-care behavior for exercise and was strongest for those who did not adhere to exercise recommendations: for every 1-point increase in ACIC score, AlC was 0.144% lower (P < 0.001). The relationship between ACIC score and AlC for those who adhered to their diet was similar to that for those who did not, after adjusting for exercise, but the overall level of control was better for those who adhered to their diet. CONCLUSIONS - Characteristics of the primary care clinic where one receives care are an important predictor of glucose control. If resources for implementing the CCM are limited, one might want to focus on clinics with low ACIC scores that serve a population of patients who are sedentary because this population may be likely to realize the most benefit from improved glucose control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available