4.4 Article

Negotiation, Sanctions, and Context Dependency in the Legume-Rhizobium Mutualism

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 178, Issue 1, Pages 1-14

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/659997

Keywords

sanctions; partner choice; partner fidelity feedback; biological markets; partner control; context dependency

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-0645791]
  2. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture through National Science Foundation (NSF) [EF-0832858]
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [0832858] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two important questions about mutualisms are how the fitness costs and benefits to the mutualist partners are determined and how these mechanisms affect the evolutionary dynamics of the mutualism. We tackle these questions with a model of the legume-rhizobium symbiosis that regards the mutualism outcome as a result of biochemical negotiations between the plant and its nodules. We explore the fitness consequences of this mechanism to the plant and rhizobia and obtain four main results. First, negotiations permit the plant to differentially reward more-cooperative rhizobia-a phenomenon termed plant sanctions-but only when more-cooperative rhizobia also provide the plant with good outside options during negotiations with other nodules. Second, negotiations may result in seemingly paradoxical cases where the plant is worse off when it has a choice between two strains of rhizobia than when infected by either strain alone. Third, even when sanctions are effective, they are by themselves not sufficient to maintain cooperative rhizobia in a population: less cooperative strains always have an advantage at the population level. Finally, partner fidelity feedback, together with genetic correlations between a rhizobium strain's cooperativeness and the outside options it provides, can maintain cooperative rhizobia. Our results show how joint control over the outcome of a mutualism through the proximate mechanism of negotiation can affect the evolutionary dynamics of interspecific cooperation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available