4.6 Article

Peritoneal natural killer cells from epithelial ovarian cancer patients show an altered phenotype and bind to the tumour marker MUC16 (CA125)

Journal

IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 122, Issue 3, Pages 418-429

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02660.x

Keywords

natural killer; ovarian cancer; MUC16; CA125; immune suppression

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA014520, CA14520] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ovarian tumour marker MUC16 (CA125) inhibits the cytotoxic responses of human natural killer (NK) cells and down-regulates CD16. Here we show that approximately 10% of the peripheral blood NK cells (PBNK) from the epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients are CD16(-) CD56(br) whereas 40% of the peritoneal fluid NK (PFNK) carry this phenotype, which is usually associated with NK cells from the lymph nodes or human decidua. PBNK from healthy donors exposed to PF show a significant increase in the CD16(-) CD56(br) population. This shift in phenotype is not caused by increased apoptosis of the CD16(+) CD56(dim) cells or selective proliferation of the CD16(-) CD56(br) NK cells. Thus, the terminal differentiation of the CD16(-) CD56(br) NK cells to CD16(+) CD56(dim) subset that occurs during normal NK cell development may actually be a reversible step. A majority of the NK cell receptors (NKp46, NKp44, NKG2D, CD244, CD226, CD158a, CD158b, and CD158e) studied were down-regulated in the PFNK. MUC16 binds selectively to 30-40% of CD16(+) CD56(dim) NK cells in EOC patients indicating that phenotypic alterations in these cells are mediated by tumour-derived soluble factors. Similar to EOC, MUC16 in early pregnancy also binds to NK cells suggesting shared mechanisms of NK cell suppression in feto-maternal tolerance and immune evasion by ovarian cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available