4.4 Article

Testosterone-Mediated Effects on Fitness-Related Phenotypic Traits and Fitness

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 173, Issue 4, Pages 475-487

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/597222

Keywords

trade-off; immune response; dominance; cost of reproduction; sexual signals; aggression; spacing behavior

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [103508, 108566, 118603, 109165, 204284, 115961, 119200, 104568, 108955]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [103508, 108955, 104568, 204284, 103508, 108955, 108566, 104568, 204284, 108566] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The physiological and behavioral mechanisms underlying life-history trade-offs are a continued source of debate. Testosterone (T) is one physiological factor proposed to mediate the trade-off between reproduction and survival. We use phenotypic engineering and multiple laboratory and field fitness-related phenotypic traits to test the effects of elevated T between two bank vole Myodes glareolus groups: dominant and subordinate males. Males with naturally high T levels showed higher social status (laboratory dominance) and mobility (distance between capture sites) than low-T males, and the effect of T on immune response was also T group specific, suggesting that behavioral strategies may exist in male bank voles due to the correlated responses of T. Exogenous T enhanced social status, mate searching (polygon of capture sites), mobility, and reproductive success (relative measure of pups sired). However, exogenous T also resulted in the reduction of immune function, but only in males from the high-T group. This result may be explained either by the immunosuppression costs of T or by differential sensitivity of different behavioral strategies to steroids. Circulating T levels were found to be heritable; therefore, female bank voles would derive indirect genetic benefits via good genes from mating with males signaling dominance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available