Journal
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
Volume 31, Issue 11, Pages 839-842Publisher
BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2007.00477.x
Keywords
cardiac assist device; cardiogenic shock; cardiac unloading; intra-aortic balloon pump; hemodynamics; myocardial recovery
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Some patients in need of hemodynamic support do not respond to intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) therapy. Hemodynamic stability can then be obtained by a more potent cardiac assist device, like the Impella catheter pump. Whether additional IABP support additional to Impella support can provide more optimal hemodynamic myocardial conditions is examined in this study. Seven sheep were implemented with IABP and Impella. An acute myocardial infarction was induced. Hemodynamic performance was assessed during baseline, during Impella support and IABP support individually, and during the combined Impella plus IABP support. The Impella support provided a reduction of afterload with 30% and an increase of coronary artery flow with 47%. The IABP increased coronary artery flow (13%), carotid artery flow (16%), and aortic ascending blood pressure (6%); a similar (but stronger) effect was provided when using the IABP support additional to Impella support and, respectively, increases of 33, 21, and 19% were established. The oxygen demand-supply ratio decreased by 25% due to the extra use of the IABP. A combination of IABP and Impella provides the most optimal hemodynamic myocardial conditions compared to either stand-alone support.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available