3.8 Article

Biochemical remission and recurrence rate of secreting pituitary adenomas after transsphenoidal adenomectomy: long-term endocrinologic follow-up results

Journal

SURGICAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages 513-518

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.05.057

Keywords

pituitary adenoma; acromegaly; Cushing disease; prolactinoma; transsphenoidal surgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Transsphenoidal surgery is safe and effective in patients with secreting pituitary adenomas; however, variable outcomes have been reported according to the different criteria used to define the biochemical remission of hormone hypersecretion. We report the long-term endocrinologic follow-up results of a large cohort of patients who underwent TSS for secreting pituitary adenomas according to the most recent stringent criteria of cure. Methods: Two hundred ten consecutive patients were operated on by TSS between 1995 and 2004 for a secreting pituitary adenoma (65 PRL-, 109 GH-, and 36 ACTH-secreting adenomas) and were considered for the study. Results: The overall remission rate was 65% for the whole series, being 64%, 61%, and 75% for PRL-, GH-, and ACTH-secreting adenomas, respectively. Eighty-six percent of microadenomas and 53% of macroadenomas were cured by surgery. Remission rates were significantly higher in GH- and ACTH-secreting pituitary macroadenomas than in macroprolactinomas. At a median follow-up of 56 months, tumor recurrence was 0%, 11%, and 14% for GH-, ACTH-, and PRL-secreting tumors. Tumor size, cavernous sinus invasion, and high hormone levels were negatively correlated to the outcome. Conclusion: Transsphenoidal surgery remains an effective treatment for secreting pituitary tumors according to the most recent criteria of cure. Patients with PRL- or ACTH-secreting adenomas may recur after apparently successful surgery, thereby justifying long-term careful endocrinologic follow-up. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available