4.7 Article

Short-term effects of carbon monoxide on mortality: An analysis within the APHEA project

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
Volume 115, Issue 11, Pages 1578-1583

Publisher

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.10375

Keywords

air pollution; carbon monoxide; heterogeneity; modeling; mortality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the short-term effects of carbon monoxide on total and cardiovascular mortality in 19 European cities participating in the APHEA-2 (Air Pollution and Health: A European Approach) project. METHODS: We examined the association using hierarchical models implemented in two stages. In the first stage, data from each city were analyzed separately, whereas in the second stage the city-specific air pollution estimates were regressed on city-specific covariates to obtain overall estimates and to explore sources of possible heterogeneity. We evaluated the sensitivity of our results by applying different degrees of smoothing for seasonality control in the city-specific analysis. RESULTS: We found significant associations of CO with total and cardiovascular mortality. A 1-mg/m(3) increase in the 2-day mean of CO, levels was associated with a 1.20% [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-1.77%] increase in total deaths and a 1.25% (95% CI, 0.30-2.21%) increase in cardiovascular deaths. There was indication of confounding with black smoke and nitrogen dioxide, but the pollutant-adjusted effect of CO on mortality remained at least marginally statistically significant. The effect of CO on total and cardiovascular mortality was observed mainly in western and southern European cities and was larger when the standardized mortality rate was lower. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large study are consistent with an independent effect of CO on mortality. The heterogeneity found in the effect estimates among cities may be explained partly by specific city characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available