4.4 Review

The Consequences of Spatial Structure for the Evolution of Pathogen Transmission Rate and Virulence

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 174, Issue 4, Pages 441-454

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/605375

Keywords

spatial structure; pathogen virulence; transmission rate; competition-persistence trade-off; pathogen evolution

Funding

  1. University of Michigan Elizabeth C. Crosby Research Fund
  2. University of Michigan Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The distribution of organisms in space can be an important mediator of species interactions, but its evolutionary effects on those interactions are only beginning to be explored. These effects may be especially relevant to pathogen-host interactions. A detailed understanding of how and when spatial structure will affect the evolution of pathogen traits is likely to aid our ability to control rapidly emerging infectious diseases. Here we review a growing body of theoretical studies suggesting that spatial structure can lead to the evolution of an intermediate pathogen transmission rate and virulence. We explain the results of these studies in terms of a competition-persistence trade-off. These studies strongly suggest that local host interactions, local host dispersal, and relatively low host reproduction rates create a host population spatial structure that enforces this trade-off and leads to the evolution of lower pathogen transmission rates and virulence. They also suggest that when spatial structure exists, it can dominate over the shape of the transmission-virulence trade-off in determining pathogen traits. We also identify important areas of future research, including quantifying pathogen fitness in a spatial context in order to gain a more mechanistic understanding of the effects of spatial structure and observationally and experimentally testing theoretical predictions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available