4.7 Article

Angiopoietin-2 serum levels are elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages 2471-2481

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01377.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Liver cirrhosis is characterized by remodeling leading to nodules that are difficult to discern from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) serum levels are used for the screening for HCC, with limited success. We evaluated angiopoietin-2 as a serum marker in patients with cirrhosis and with HCC. Methods: In a retrospective study, we measured angiopoietin-2 serum levels in 131 patients with HCC, 180 patients with cirrhosis, and 40 healthy controls. We also determined AFP serum levels in patients with HCC and compared the test characteristics of both serum markers. The expression patterns of angiopoietin-2 were determined by in situ hybridization in healthy and cirrhotic livers as well as in HCC. Results: Angiopoietin-2 serum levels were elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis (P < 0.0001) compared with healthy controls. Levels were further elevated in patients with HCC compared with healthy controls (P < 0.0001) and cirrhotic patients (P < 0.0001). The combination with AFP measurements led to improved discrimination between HCC and cirrhosis. Angiopoietin-2 message was present in tumor cells of HCCs but was absent from hepatocytes of cirrhotic and healthy livers. In cirrhosis, message was detected within the strands of fibrous tissue. Conclusions: Serum angiopoietin-2 levels are elevated in patients with cirrhosis, implicating a possible role of the angiopoietin-Tie-2 system for neoangiogenesis in cirrhosis. Serum levels are further elevated in patients with HCC, suggesting the potential use of angiopoietin-2 as a marker for the detection of cirrhosis and HCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available