4.4 Review

Latitudinal distribution, migration, and testosterone levels in birds

Journal

AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 172, Issue 4, Pages 533-546

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/590955

Keywords

aggression; androgens; evolution; phylogeny; steroid hormones; territorial conflicts

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Technologia [XXI/BPD/20142/99, XXI/P/BIA/10251/98]
  2. National Science Foundation [IBN-0317141]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tropical bird species usually have lower testosterone (T) levels during breeding than temperate species. However, the potential mechanisms behind the positive interspecific correlation between T and latitude remain unexplored. In a comparative study of more than 100 bird species, we examined whether social constraints during male-male competition arising from migration and breeding synchrony are responsible for the latitude effects. Species that breed at higher latitudes are more likely to migrate and experience more intense intrasexual competition upon spring arrival than nonmigrant species from lower latitudes. Additionally, species from higher latitudes cope with shorter breeding seasons and thus with more synchronous breeding, which selects for high T titers via increased male-male conflicts. Accordingly, peak T levels were associated with migration and the duration of the egg laying period that reflects breeding synchrony. Because migration and breeding synchrony were related to latitudinal distribution, they appear to be important components of the latitude effects on T. A multivariate model controlling for covariation of predictor variables revealed that latitude remained the strongest predictor of peak T. Therefore, selection due to migration and breeding synchrony may partially cause the latitude effect, but other geographically varying factors may also play a role in mediating peak T levels at different latitudes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available