4.7 Article

The natural history of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages 1172-1177

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.023

Keywords

cow's milk; food allergy; IgE; prognosis; tolerance

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [5T32 AI07007] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Cow's milk allergy (CMA) is the most common food allergy in infants and young children, affecting 2 % to 3 % of the general population. Most studies have shown the prognosis of developing tolerance to cow's milk to be good, with most outgrowing their allergy by age 3 years. Objective: To define the natural course of CMA and identify the factors that best predict outcome in a large referral population of children with CMA. Methods: Clinical history, test results, and final outcome were collected on 807 patients with IgE-mediated CMA. Patients were considered tolerant after they passed a challenge or experienced no reactions in the past 12 months and had a cow's milk IgE (cm-IgE) level <3 kU/L. Results: Rates of resolution were 19% by age 4 years, 42% by age 8 years, 64% by age 12 years, and 79% by 16 years. Patients with persistent allergy had higher cm-IgE levels at all ages to age 16 years. The highest cm-IgE for each patient, defined as peak cm-IgE, was found to be highly predictive of outcome (P <.001). Coexisting asthma (P <.001) and allergic rhinitis (P <.001) were also significant predictors of outcome. Conclusion: The prognosis for CMA in this population is worse than previously reported. However, some patients developed tolerance during adolescence, indicating that follow-up and re-evaluation of CMA patients is important in their care. cm-IgE level is highly predictive of outcome. Clinical implications: The increasing potential for persistence of CMA, along with cm-IgE level's effect on prognosis, should be considered when counseling families regarding expected clinical course.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available