4.4 Article

Aggregate formation by ERp57-deficient MHC class I peptide-loading complexes

Journal

TRAFFIC
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages 1530-1542

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2007.00639.x

Keywords

endoplasmic reticulum; ERp57; FRET; MHC class I peptide; loading complex; protein aggregates; tapasin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-resident proteins TAP, tapasin and ERp57 are the core components of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I peptide-loading complex and play an important role in peptide loading by MHC class I-beta(2)microglobulin dimers. ERp57 and tapasin form a stable disulfide-linked heterodimer within the peptide-loading complex. We demonstrate that ERp57-deficient loading complexes, obtained by expression in a tapasin-negative cell line of a tapasin mutant (C95A) that is not able to form a disulfide bond with ERp57, are prone to aggregation. We studied the assembly, stability and aggregation of the core loading complex using cell lines stably expressing fluorescently tagged tapasin (wild type or C95A mutant) and TAP1. Part of the loading complexes containing the tagged C95A tapasin and TAP1 were sequestered in the ER, without change of their ER transmembrane topology, and were surrounded by a mesh of filaments at the cytosolic side, resulting in formation of protein aggregates with characteristic morphology. Protein aggregates were associated with changes in ER protein turnover but did not affect the cell viability and did not induce the unfolded protein response. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis of the aggregate-free ER fraction revealed that lack of ERp57 did not affect the stoichiometry or stability of tapasin-TAP1 interactions in the assembled 'soluble' core loading complexes. We conclude that the presence of ERp57 is important for the stability of core loading complexes, and that in its absence, the core loading complexes may form stable aggregates within the ER.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available