4.5 Article

Re-examining the core features of autism: a comparison of autism spectrum disorder and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 48, Issue 11, Pages 1111-1121

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01782.x

Keywords

Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS); Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R); social deficits; diagnosis; autistic disorder; pervasive developmental disorder; diagnosis; fetal alcohol syndrome; social behavior; symptomatology

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [T32AA007477] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [U19-HD 35482, U19 HD035482] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01-MH066496, R01 MH066496] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) are both characterized by social difficulties, but overall clinical descriptions of the two disorders are different. Method: Twenty-nine children with autism and 33 children with pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) were compared to 29 children with FASD of equivalent age and full-scale IQ. To isolate social deficits that are most unique to ASD, all participants were administered the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS). Parents of the children completed the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R). Results: Difficulties in initiating social interaction, sharing affect, and using nonverbal communication were common in children with ASD but rare in children with FASD. Socially inappropriate behaviors and difficulty with peers were common in both groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that whereas propensity for social interaction appears to be a differentiating factor between children with ASD and those with non-spectrum disorders, impaired quality of social interaction may be less diagnostically discriminative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available