4.4 Article

Incidence and persistence of zoonotic bacterial and protozoan pathogens in a beef cattle feedlot runoff control-vegetative treatment system

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages 1873-1882

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0100

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining the survival of zoonotic pathogens in livestock manure and turnoff is critical for understanding the environmental and public health risks associated with these wastes. The occurrence and persistence of the bacterial pathogens Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Campylobacter spp. in a passive beef cattle feedlot runoff control-vegetative treatment system were examined over a 26-mo period. Incidence of the protozoans Cryptosparidium spp. and Giarida spp. was also assessed. The control system utilizes a shallow basin to collect liquid volume is attained, the liquid is discharged from the basin onto a 4.5-ha vegetative treatment area (VTA) of bromegrass which is harvested as hay. Basin discharge transported E. coli O157, Campylobacter fspp., and generic E. coli into the VTA soil, but without additional discharge from the basin, the pathogen prevalences decreased over time. Similarly, the VTA soil concentrations of generic E. coli initially decreased rapidly, but lower residual populations persisted. Isolationh of Cryptospordium oocysts and Giardia cysts form VTA samples was infrequent, indicating differences in sedimentation and/or transport in comparison to bacteria. Isolationh of generic E. coli from freshly cut hay from VTA regions that received basin discharge (12 of 30 vs. 1 of 30 control samples) provided evidence for the risk of contamination; however, neither E. coli O157 or Campylobacter spp. were recovered from the hay following baling. This work indicates that the runoff control system is effective for reducing environment risk by containing and removing pathogens from feedlot runoff.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available