4.2 Article

Association between caffeine intake and risk of Parinson's disease among fast and slow metabolizers

Journal

PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages 1001-1005

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0b013e3282f09265

Keywords

caffeine; CYP1A2; Parkinson's disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP 1A2) is responsible for more than 90% of caffeine clearance. A polymorphic variant of CYP1A2 (-163C>A) (rs762551) is associated with high CYP1A2 inducibility. Both caffeine and its main metabolite, paraxanthine, may be neuroprotective. The association between caffeine intake and risk of Parkinson's disease (PD) in fast and slow caffeine metabolizers has not been compared. Objective: In a case-control study, we analyzed the relationship between caffeine intake and risk of PD in both fast and slow caffeine metabolizers. Methods All the study participants were recruited prospectively, and interviewed for information on the amount and duration of caffeine intake. Genotyping of the CYP1A2 variant was carried out using the allelic discrimination method. Results: out of 1000 participants who were initially screened, 886 consisting of 418 PD and 468 race, sex and age matched controls were included. No evidence existed to suggest any association between CYP1A2 and the onset of PD (P=0.08). A significant association was seen between caffeine intake and the onset of PD (P = 2.01 X 10(-5)), with the odds ratio for moderate and high drinkers at 0.71 [95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.50-1.001 and 0.47 (95% Cl: 0.34-0.65), respectively against the low drinkers. Multivariate analysis revealed no evidence of any interaction effects of caffeine with CYP1A2 (P= 0.956). Conclusion: The association between caffeine intake and risk of PD was similarly observed in both fast and slow caffeine metabolizers, supporting experimental evidence in animal models that both caffeine and its major metabolite, paraxanthine, are neuroprotective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available