4.7 Article

Insights into the mechanism of FTY720 and compatibility with regulatory T cells for the inhibition of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages 3480-3488

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-05-087940

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA072669, R01 CA 072669] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R37 HL 56067, R37 HL056067] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI 034495, R01 AI034495] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The immunomodulator FTY720 (FTY) has been shown to be beneficial in experimental models of organ transplantation and autoimmunity. We show that FTY significantly inhibited but did not prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in lethally irradiated or nonirradiated allogeneic recipients. Although most studies implicate prevention of lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs as the primary mechanism of action, our data indicate that FTY effects on the host are more likely to be responsible for GVHD inhibition. FTY reduced splenic CD11c(+) cells by 50%, and similarly reduced CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell responder frequencies in the spleen early after transplantation. Imaging of GFP(+) effectors indicated that FTY modified donor effector T-cell migration to secondary lymphoid organs, but did not uniformly trap T cells in lymph nodes or prevent early effector migration to GVHD parenchymal target organs. Administration of FTY only prior to transplantation inhibited GVHD, indicating that the primary function of FTY may be targeted to host cells. FTY was additive with regulatory T cells for GVHD inhibition. FTY slightly impaired but did not abrogate a graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect against C1498, a myeloid leukemia. Our data further define the mechanisms of action and provide insight as to the potential clinical uses of FTY in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available