4.7 Article

Adapting regional eutrophication targets for surface waters -: influence of the EU water framework directive national policy and climate change

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
Volume 10, Issue 7-8, Pages 734-742

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.004

Keywords

EU water framework directive; national policy; nitrogen; phosphorus; regional targets

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large amounts of waterborne nutrients are major problems for society since they can cause harmful algal blooms in surface water bodies. Consequently, there are a variety of national and international guidelines, e.g. Swedish National Environmental Quality Objectives and the EU Water Framework Directive, which include targets to be achieved within a certain time frame. This paper uses the example of a large Swedish lake to show that national and international targets must be adapted to the local situations. Despite decreasing nutrient concentrations, cyanobacterial blooms in the lake have increased over recent years. We found that these blooms coincide with depleted nitrate-nitrogen concentrations and increased water temperatures. We propose a simple model with water temperature, nitrate-nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations as input variables as a basis for formulation of regional eutrophication targets. Political decisions should be preceded by open discussion between policyrnakers and scientists to differentiate between real knowledge, assumptions or feelings. For optimal results, recommendations for reducing nutrient load should consider all sources, including urban stormwater and wastewater from rural houses, and should be founded on a balanced reduction in emissions of algae-available nutrients. In addition, climate change calls for more effective environmental policy to protect surface water resources. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available