4.6 Article

Risk factors for invasive pneumococcal disease among Navajo adults

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 9, Pages 1080-1087

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm178

Keywords

alcoholism; heart failure; congestive; Indians; North American; kidney failure; chronic; risk factors; Streptococcus pneumoniae; unemployment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) is 3-5 times more common among Navajo adults than in the general US population. The authors conducted a case-control study to identify risk factors for IPD among Navajo adults. Navajos aged >= 18 years with IPD were identified through prospective, population-based active laboratory surveillance (December 1999-February 2002). Controls matched to cases on age, gender, and neighborhood were selected. Risk factors were identified through structured interviews and medical record reviews. The authors conducted a matched analysis based on 118 cases and 353 controls. Risk factors included in the final multivariable analysis were chronic renal failure (odds ratio (OR) = 2.6, 95% confidence interval (Cl): 0.9, 7.7), congestive heart failure (OR = 5.6, 95% Cl: 2.2, 14.5), self-reported alcohol use or alcoholism (OR = 2.9, 95% Cl: 1.5, 5.4), body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)(2)) <5th (OR = 3.2, 95% Cl: 1.0, 10.6) or >95th (OR = 2.8, 95% Cl: 1.0, 8.0) percentile, and unemployment (OR = 2.6, 95% Cl: 1.2, 5.5). The population attributable fractions were 10% for chronic renal failure, 18% for congestive heart failure, 30% for self-reported alcohol use or alcoholism, 6% for body mass index, and 20% for unemployment. Several modifiable risk factors for IPD in Navajos were identified. The high prevalence of renal failure, alcoholism, and unemployment among Navajo adults compared with the general US population may explain some of their increased risk of IPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available