4.5 Article

Elastic softening of metamict titanite CaTiSiO5: Radiation damage and annealing

Journal

AMERICAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 96, Issue 8-9, Pages 1254-1261

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2138/am.2011.3747

Keywords

Titanite; resonant ultrasound spectroscopy; elastic moduli; metamict; Kramers-Kronig; heat capacity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have measured the elastic response of radiation-damaged titanite. CaTiSiO5, as a function of thermal annealing. We estimate the bulk inodulus of the damaged samples (similar to 24% amorphous) to be 85 GPa, which is much softer than for undamaged crystalline titanite [131.4 GPa; Angel et al. (1999)]. Conversely, the lowest shear modulus oldie radiation-damaged material is 52-58 GPa, which is harder that of the undamaged titanite, 46-52 GPa. The bulk and shear moduli of the radiation-damaged materials are close to those of thermal titanite glass, B-glass approximate to 75 GPa and G(glass) approximate to 47 GPa, and are much smaller than expected based on other radiation-damaged materials such as zircon (ZrSiO4). Surprisingly, annealing of the damaged titanite in the range 600 < T < 1000 K leads to additional massive softening of the shear moduli. During annealing the shear modulus of titan he sample I softened from 58 to 29 GPa, and sample 2 softened from 52 to 19 GPa. The temperature range for the softening coincides with that found for crystallization of the amorphous regions, as measured previously by diffraction and spectroscopic methods. In contrast to the huge softening of the ultrasonically measured shear modulus, the calorimetrically measured Debye temperature theta(D) increases by similar to 5%, suggesting a small intrinsic hardening of the acoustic shear modes. Additional heating to 1473 K leads, in one titanite sample, to a steep increase of the shear modulus to values much larger than that of the initial, radiation-damaged material. Theoretical models are discussed to rationalize the massive softening due to both radiation damage and subsequent anneal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available