4.6 Article

Deuterium exchange and mass spectrometry reveal the interaction differences of two synthetic modulators of RXRα LBD

Journal

PROTEIN SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 2491-2501

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1110/ps.073019707

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK060013, DK060013] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [P01 ES000040, ES00040] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [00210] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein amide hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange was used to compare the interactions of two antagonists, UVI 2112 and UVI 3003, with that of the agonist, 9-cis-retinoic acid, upon binding to the human retinoid X receptor alpha ligand-binding domain (hRXR alpha LBD) homodimer. Analysis of the H/D content by mass spectrometry showed that in comparison to 9-cis-retinoic acid, the antagonists provide much greater protection toward deuterium exchange-in throughout the protein, suggesting that the protein-antagonist complex adopts a more restricted conformation or ensemble of conformations in which solvent accesses to amide protons are reduced. A comparison between the two antagonists shows that UVI 3003 is more protective in the C-terminal region due to the extra hydrophobic interactions derived from the atoms in the benzene ring of the carboxylic acid chain. It was less protective within regions comprising peptides 271-278 and 326-330 due to differences in conformational orientation, and/or shorter carboxylic acid chain length. Decreased deuterium exchange-in in the segment 234-239 where the residues do not involve interactions with the ligand was observed with the two antagonists, but not with 9-cis-RA. The amide protons of helix 12 of the agonist-or antagonist-occupied protein in solution have the same deuterium exchange rates as the unliganded protein, supporting a suggestion made previously that helix 12 can cover the occupied binding cavity only with the cofactor present to adjust its location.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available