4.4 Article

Testing β-helix terminal coils stability by targeted substitutions with non-proteogenic amino acids:: A molecular dynamics study

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 2, Pages 177-189

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2007.07.014

Keywords

beta-helix proteins; beta-sheet conformation; structural motifs; unnatural synthetic amino acids; nanotechnological applications; Oligopeptides; molecular dynamics; peptide nanotubes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The search for new building block templates useful for nanostructures design, targets protein motifs with a wide range of structures. Stabilizing these building blocks when extracted from their natural environment becomes a fundamental goal in order to successfully control their assembly. Targeted replacements of natural residues by conformationally constrained amino acids were shown to be a successful strategy to achieve such stabilization. In this work, the effect of replacing natural amino acids by non-proteogenic residues in a Phelix building block has been evaluated using extensive molecular dynamics simulations. Here, we focus on systematic substitutions of valine residues present in P-sheet segments of a beta-helical building block excised from Escherichia coli galactoside acetyltransferase, residues 131-165. Four different types of non-proteogenic amino acids have been considered for substitution: (i) one dehydroamino acid, (ii) two beta-amino acids, (iii) one P-amino acid and (iv) two alpha,alpha-dialkylamino acids. Our results indicate that the ability of non-proteogenic amino acids to stabilize small building block motifs is site-dependent. We conclude that if the replacement does not alter the energy balance between attractive non-covalent interactions and steric hindrance, synthetic residues are suitable candidates to nucleate P-helix formation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available