4.2 Article

A screening method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons determination in water by headspace SPME with GC-FID

Journal

CHROMATOGRAPHIA
Volume 66, Issue 9-10, Pages 773-777

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1365/s10337-007-0371-y

Keywords

gas chromatography; headspace solid-phase microextraction; experimental design; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; water analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple method for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with gas chromatography-flame ionisation detector (GC-FID) was developed. In order to obtain the convenient experimental conditions for HS-SPME extraction an experimental design with two steps was accomplished. A 2(6-2) fractional factorial design and central composite design (CCD) considering three significant factors were used. Naphthalene, anthracene and fluoranthene were chosen as representatives of two, three and four aromatic rings, and the global response of three PAHs was used for the results, evaluation. The chosen extraction conditions were: 85 mu m polyacrylate fibre; 50 degrees C temperature; 60 min time; 20 mL-dissolution volume (in 40 mL glass vial); without salt addition; and 2 min desorption time. The procedure was extended to other seven PAHs (acenaphthylene, acenaphthene, fluorene, phenanthrene, pyrene, chrysene and benzo(a)anthracene) and the analytical characteristics were checked. The limit of detection (LOD) was from 0.08 (anthracene) to 0.20 mu g L-1 (naphthalene). The precision expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD in %) using 50 mu g L-1 of each analyte ranged from 6.8 to 17%. The method was applied to the analysis of the surface waters and leaching waters of contaminated soils from Gipuzkoa (North Spain). The PAHs were not detected in surface water samples. Most of the PAHs were found in the leachates from contaminated soils showing a maximum global value of 75.5 mu g L-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available