4.7 Article

On the mass of the neutron star in V395 carinae/2s 0921-630

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 669, Issue 2, Pages L85-L88

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/523848

Keywords

accretion, accretion disks; binaries : general; stars : individual (V395 Carinae/2S 0921-630); stars : neutron; X-rays : binaries

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D005914/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/D005914/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report high-resolution optical spectroscopy of the low-mass X-ray binary V395 Car/2S 0921-630 obtained with the MIKE echelle spectrograph on the Magellan-Clay telescope. Our spectra are obtained near the inferior conjunction of the mass donor star, and we exploit the absorption lines originating from the back side of the K-type object to accurately derive its rotational velocity. Using K0-K1 III templates, we find v sin i = 32.9 +/- 0.8 km s(-1). We show that the choice of template star and the assumed limb-darkening coefficient has little impact on the derived rotational velocity. This value is a significant revision downward compared to previously published values. We derive new system parameter constraints in light of our much lower rotational velocity. We find,, and, where the errors have been estimated M-1 = 1.44 +/- 0.10 M-circle dot, M = 0.35 +/- 0.03 M-circle dot, q = 0.24 +/- 0.02 through a Monte Carlo simulation. A possible remaining systematic effect is the fact that we may be overestimating the orbital velocity of the mass donor due to irradiation effects. However, any correction for this effect will only reduce the compact object mass further, down to a minimum mass of. There is thus M-1 = 1.05 +/- 0.08 M-circle dot. There is thus strong evidence that the compact object in this binary is a neutron star of rather typical mass and that the previously reported mass values of 2-4 M-circle dot were too high due to an overestimate of the rotational broadening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available