4.7 Article

Mass-radius relationships for solid exoplanets

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 669, Issue 2, Pages 1279-1297

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/521346

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0813934] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0813934] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use new interior models of cold planets to investigate the mass-radius relationships of solid exoplanets, considering planets made primarily of iron, silicates, water, and carbon compounds. We find that the mass-radius relationships for cold terrestrial mass planets of all compositions we considered follow a generic functional form that is not a simple power law: log(10)R(s) = k(1) + 1/3log(10)(M-s) - k(2)M(s)(k3) for up to M-p approximate to 20 M-circle plus, where M-s and R-s are scaled mass and radius values. This functional form arises because the common building blocks of solid planets all have equations of state that are well approximated by a modified polytrope of the form rho = rho(0) + cP(n). We find that highly detailed planet interior models, including temperature structure and phase changes, are not necessary to derive solid exoplanet bulk composition from mass and radius measurements. For solid exoplanets with no substantial atmosphere we have also found the following: with similar to 5% fractional uncertainty in planet mass and radius it is possible to distinguish among planets composed predominantly of iron or silicates or water ice but not more detailed compositions; with similar to 5% uncertainty water ice planets with greater than or similar to 25% water by mass may be identified; the minimum plausible planet size for a given mass is that of a pure iron planet; and carbon planet mass-radius relationships overlap with those of silicate and water planets due to similar zero-pressure densities and equations of state. We propose a definition of super-Earths'' based on the clear distinction in radii between planets with significant gas envelopes and those without.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available