4.5 Article

Vaccination against Ostertagia ostertagi with subfractions of the protective ES-thiol fraction

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 149, Issue 3-4, Pages 239-245

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.08.014

Keywords

Ostertagia ostertagi; activation-associated secreted proteins; cysteine proteases; vaccine; cattle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous vaccination trials against Ostertagia ostertagi in cattle have demonstrated the protective capacity of a protein fraction termed ES-thiol, which is enriched for activation-associated secreted proteins (ASPs) and cysteine proteases. In this study, ES-thiol was subfractionated through Q-Sepharose anion exchange chromatography to determine whether the ASPs and/or the cysteine proteases are responsible for the induced protection. Calves (seven/group) were immunized three times intramuscularly with 100 mu g of ES-thiol or equivalent amounts of an ASP-enriched fraction, a cysteine protease-enriched fraction or a rest fraction, with QuilA adjuvant. A negative control group only received QuilA. After the final immunization the animals were challenged with a trickle infection of 25,000 infectious L3 larvae (1000 L3/day; 5 days/week). During a 2-month period the geometric mean cumulative faecal egg count (FEC) of the ES-thiol group was reduced by 62% compared to the QuilA control group (P < 0.05). Groups injected with the ASP-enriched, the cysteine protease-enriched and the rest fraction demonstrated a reduction in cumulative FEC of 74, 80 and 70%, respectively (P < 0.01). Although no significant reductions in worm burdens were observed, adult male and female worms were significantly smaller in all vaccinated groups (P < 0.05), except for male worms from the ES-thiol group. These results suggest the protective capacity of ASPs and the presence of other protective antigens in the ES-thiol fraction. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available