4.4 Article

Prevalence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with documented coronary heart disease or risk equivalent and controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 1499-1501

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.06.058

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current guidelines identify low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol as the primary target for cardiovascular prevention but also recognize low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol as an important secondary target. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of low HDL cholesterol in a contemporary ambulatory high-risk population across various LDL cholesterol levels, including patients taking statins. Screening of 44,052 electronic medical records from a primary care practice identified 1,512 high-risk patients with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents. Low HDL cholesterol (<= 40 mg/dl in men, <= 50 mg/dl in women) was present in 66% of the 1,512 patients. Low HDL cholesterol was prevalent across all LDL cholesterol levels but most prevalent in patients with LDL cholesterol <= 70 mg/dl (79% vs 66% in those with LDL cholesterol 71 to 100 mg/dl and 64% in patients with LDL cholesterol > 100 mg/dl, p < 0.01). Low HDL cholesterol was equally and highly prevalent in patients taking statins (67%) and those not taking statins (64%) (p = NS). HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels correlated poorly (R-2 = 0.01), and this was unaffected by gender or statin treatment. In conclusion, in high-risk patients with CHD or CHD risk equivalents, low HDL cholesterol levels remain prevalent despite statin treatment and the achievement of aggressive LDL cholesterol goals. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available