4.5 Article

Genistein protects pancreatic β cells against cytokine-mediated toxicity

Journal

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 278, Issue 1-2, Pages 18-28

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.08.003

Keywords

genistein; cytokine; NF kappa B; ERK-1/2; JAK-STAT; pancreatic beta-cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the past few decades, the use of genistein as an anti-inflammatory agent has gained much attention. Our current study focuses on the preventive effects of genistein on cytokine-induced pancreatic P-cell damage. Treatment of RINm5F (RIN) rat insulinoma cells with interleukin (IL)-1 beta and interferon (IFN)-gamma induced cell damage, which was correlated with nitric oxide (NO) production. Genistein completely prevented cytokine-mediated cytotoxicity and NO production, a finding that correlated well with reduced levels of the inducible form of NO synthase (iNOS) mRNA and protein. The molecular mechanism of genistein inhibition of iNOS gene expression appeared to involve the inhibition of NF kappa B activation. The cytokine induced increases in NF kappa B binding activity, nuclear p50 and p65 subunit levels, and I kappa B alpha degradation in cytosol compared to unstimulated cells; genistein abolished all of these parameters. The cytoprotective effects of genistein are also mediated through the suppression of ERK-1/2 and Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. In a second set of experiments, rat islets were used. The findings on P-cell protective effects of genistein were essentially the same as for the RIN cell data, namely genistein prevented cytokine-induced NO production, iNOS expression, ERK-1/2 activation, JAK/STAT activation, and impairment of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Collectively, these results suggest that genistein might be used to preserve functional P-cell mass. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available