4.6 Article

Effects of urea concentration and reaction temperature on morphology of gadolinium compounds prepared by homogeneous precipitation

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 106, Issue 1, Pages 149-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2007.05.050

Keywords

Gd2O3 : Eu3+; phosphor; homogeneous precipitation; nanoparticle; photoluminescence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Europium-activated Gd2O3 phosphor powders were prepared by homogeneous precipitation method, and the effects of urea concentration and reaction temperature on the morphology of precursor powders were investigated. The synthesized powders were characterized by means of XRD, SEM, TG/DTA and FT IR. The synthesis of gadolinium carbonate compounds was carried out using this method from relatively high concentrations of gadolinium salt and urea for the first time. Two kinds of powders formed were the crystalline Gd-2(CO3)(3)center dot 2.5H(2)O and Gd2O(CO3)(2)center dot H2O phases, which were mainly affected by reaction temperature. Namely, the Gd-2(CO3)(3)center dot 2.5H(2)O phase was formed at 80-90 degrees C, and the Gd2O(CO3)(2)center dot H2O at 100 C. The morphology of Gd-2(CO3)(3)center dot 2.5H(2)O phase was plate-like. And the powders of Gd2O(CO3)(2)center dot H2O phase showed the rectangular plate-like morphology. In order to synthesize the manometer-sized precursor powders using the homogeneous precipitation technique, it was found that EDTA/[Gd + Eu] mole ratio should be larger than 7.5 x 10(-3) M, corresponding to 15 mol% of total cation concentration. The manometer-sized precursor showed the amorphous-like pattern. The thermal decomposition behaviors of the three kinds of gadolinium carbonate compounds were also investigated. The thermal stability had the following order: Gd2O(CO3)(2)center dot H2O > Gd-2(CO3)(3)center dot 2.5H(2)O > amorphous phase. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available