4.6 Article

The lipopolysaccharide adjuvant effect on T cells relies on nonoverlapping contributions from the MyD88 pathway and CD11c+ cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 10, Pages 6524-6535

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6524

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01-AI42858, R01-AI52108, P01-AI56172, R01-AI41576] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial LPS is a natural adjuvant that induces profound effects on T cell clonal expansion, effector differentiation, and long-term T cell survival. In this study, we delineate the in vivo mechanism of LPS action by pinpointing a role for MyD88 and CD11c(+) cells. LPS induced long-term survival of superantigen-stimulated CD4 and CD8 T cells in a MyD88-dependent manner. By tracing peptide-stimulated CD4 T cells after adoptive transfer, we showed that for LPS to mediate T cell survival, the recipient mice were required to express MyD88. Even when peptide-specific CD4 T cell clonal expansion was dramatically boosted by enforced OX40 costimulation, OX40 only synergized with LPS to induce survival when the recipient mice expressed MyD88. Nevertheless, these activated, but moribund, T cells in the MyD88(-1-) mice acquired effector properties, such as the ability to synthesiz IFN-gamma, demonstrating that effector differentiation is not automatically coupled to a survival program. We confirmed this notion in reverse fashion by showing that effector differentiation was not required for the induction of T cell survival. Hence, depletion of CD11c(+) cells did not affect LPS-driven specific T cell survival, but CD11c(+) cells were paramount for optimal effector T cell differentiation as measured by IFN-gamma potential. Thus, LPS adjuvanticity is based on MyD88 promoting T cell survival, while CD11c(+) cells support effector T cell differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available