4.5 Article

Olfactory memory formation and the influence of reward pathway during appetitive learning by honey bees

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 210, Issue 22, Pages 4024-4033

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.006585

Keywords

apis mellifera; associative learning; memory consolidation; post ingestive feedback; gustation

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [9 R01 RR1466] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA017694] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animals possess the ability to assess food quality via taste and via changes in state that occur after ingestion. Here, we investigate the extent to which a honey bee's ability to assess food quality affected the formation of association with an odor stimulus and the retention of olfactory memories associated with reward. We used three different conditioning protocols in which the unconditioned stimulus (food) was delivered as sucrose stimulation to the proboscis (mouthparts), the antennae or to both proboscis and antennae. All means of delivery of the unconditioned stimulus produced robust associative conditioning with an odor. However, the memory of a conditioned odor decayed at a significantly greater rate for subjects experiencing antennal-only stimulation after either multiple- or single-trial conditioning. Finally, to test whether the act of feeding on a reward containing sucrose during conditioning affected olfactory memory formation, we conditioned honey bees to associate an odor with antennal stimulation with sucrose followed by feeding on a water droplet. We observed that a honey bee's ability to recall the conditioned odor was not significantly different from that of subjects conditioned with an antennal-only sucrose stimulus. Our results show that stimulation of the sensory receptors on the proboscis and/ or ingestion of the sucrose reward during appetitive olfactory conditioning are necessary for long-term memory formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available