4.7 Article

Infrared spectral energy distributions of z ∼ 0.7 star-forming galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 670, Issue 1, Pages 301-312

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/520529

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : starburst; infrared : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze the infrared ( IR) spectral energy distributions ( SEDs) for 10 mu m < lambda(rest) < 100 mu m for similar to 600 galaxies at z similar to 0.7 in the extended Chandra Deep Field South by stacking their Spitzer 24, 70, and 160 mu m images. We place interesting constraints on the average IR SED shape in two bins: the brightest 25% of z similar to 0.7 galaxies detected at 24 mu m, and the remaining 75% of individually detected galaxies. Galaxies without individual detections at 24 mu m were not well detected at 70 and 160 mu m even through stacking. We find that the average IR SEDs of z similar to 0.7 star- forming galaxies fall within the diversity of z similar to 0 templates. While dust obscuration L-IR/L-UV seems to be only a function of star formation rate (SFR; similar to L-IR + L-UV), not of redshift, the dust temperature of star- forming galaxies ( with SFR similar to 10 M-circle dot yr(-1)) at a given IR luminosity was lower at z similar to 0.7 than today. We suggest an interpretation of this phenomenology in terms of dust geometry: intensely star- forming galaxies at z similar to 0 are typically interacting, and host dense centrally concentrated bursts of star formation and warm dust temperatures. At z similar to 0.7, the bulk of intensely star- forming galaxies are relatively undisturbed spirals and irregulars, and we postulate that they have large amounts of widespread lower density star formation, yielding lower dust temperatures for a given IR luminosity. We recommend which IR SEDs are most suitable for modeling intermediate- redshift galaxies with different SFRs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available