4.7 Article

Comparison between the blue and red galaxy alignments detected in the sloan digital sky survey

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 670, Issue 1, Pages L1-L4

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/524032

Keywords

cosmology : observations; large-scale structure of universe; methods : statistical; online material : color figures

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [R01-2007-000-10246-0, 과06A1102] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We measure the intrinsic alignments of the blue and the red galaxies separately by analyzing the spectroscopic data of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Data Release 6 (SDSS DR6). For both samples of the red and blue galaxies with axial ratios of b/a <= 0.8, we detect a 3 sigma signal of the ellipticity correlation in the redshift range of 0 <= z <= 0.4 for an r-band absolute (model) magnitude cut of M-r <= - 19.2 (no K-correction). We note a difference in the strength and the distance scale for the red and the blue galaxy correlation eta(2D()(r): For the bright blue galaxies, it behaves as a quadratic scaling of the linear density correlation of xi(r) as eta(2D)(r) proportional to xi(2)(r) with strong signal detected only at a small distance bin of r <= 3 h(-1) Mpc, while for the bright red galaxies it follows a linear scaling as eta(2D)(r) proportional to xi(r) with signals detected at larger distance out to r similar to 6 h(-1) Mpc. We also test whether the detected correlation signal is intrinsic or spurious by quantifying the systematic error and find that the effect of the systematic error on the ellipticity correlation is negligible. It is finally concluded that our results will be useful for the weak lensing measurements as well as the understanding of the large-scale structure formation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available