4.7 Article

Multiwavelength study of massive galaxies at z ∼ 2.: I.: Star formation and galaxy growth

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 670, Issue 1, Pages 156-172

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/521818

Keywords

cosmology : observations; galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : starburst

Funding

  1. STFC [ST/F002963/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Examining a sample of massive galaxies at 1.4 < z < 2.5 with K-Vega < 22 from GOODS, we compare photometry from Spitzer at mid-and far-IR to submillimeter, radio, and rest-frame UV wavelengths, to test the agreement between different tracers of star formation rates (SFRs) and to explore the implications for galaxy assembly. For z similar to 2 galaxies with moderate luminosities (L-8 (mu m) < 10(11) L circle dot), we find that the SFR can be estimated consistently from the multiwavelength data based on local luminosity correlations. However, 20%-30% of massive galaxies, and nearly all those with L-8 (mu m) > 10(11) L-circle dot, show amid-IR excess that is likely due to the presence of obscured active nuclei, as shown in a companion paper. There is a tight and roughly linear correlation between stellar mass and SFR for 24 mu m-detected galaxies. For a given mass, the SFR at z = 2 was larger by a factor of similar to 4 and similar to 30 relative to that in star-forming galaxies at z = 1 and 0, respectively. Typical ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) at z = 2 are relatively 'transparent'' to ultraviolet light, and their activity is long lived (greater than or similar to 400 Myr), unlike that in local ULIRGs and high-redshift submillimeter-selected galaxies. ULIRGs are the common mode of star formation in massive galaxies at z = 2, and the high duty cycle suggests that major mergers are not the dominant trigger for this activity. Current galaxy formation models underpredict the normalization of the mass-SFR correlation by about a factor of 4 and the space density of ULIRGs by an order of magnitude but give better agreement for z > 1: 4 quiescent galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available