4.5 Article

Immunogenicity of the recombinant leptospiral putative outer membrane proteins as vaccine candidates

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 25, Issue 48, Pages 8190-8197

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.09.020

Keywords

recombinant proteins; leptospira; immunoprotection; hamster

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leptospiral putative outer membrane proteins (OMPs) are likely to be essential components of more effective vaccines. Recently completed genomic, sequences of Leptospira allowed us to target putative OMPs for the development of recombinant vaccines. We focused on 12 putative OMPs that had no homology with other organisms listed in the NCBI database except MceI and Well of Leptospira, which are similar to 25% homologous to MceI of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. All putative OMPs were cloned, expressed and purified as glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins. Primary screening for immunoprotective potential was performed in hamsters challenged with an LD50 inoculum of low passage serovar Pomona. Out of these 12 OMPs three fusion proteins viz. rLp 1454, rLp 1118 and rMceII were found to be protective in a hamster model of leptospirosis. The protective efficacy was evaluated on the basis of survival, histopathological lesions in vital organs and antibody responses against each antigen. All the recombinant proteins were able to enhance the survival and reduce the histopathological lesions. In contrast, control animals immunized with rGST demonstrated low survival and had significant lesions. Further, these three proteins were evaluated for synergistic protective efficacy as compared to LigA, which has already been established as a protective antigen. Our results indicate that rLp 1454, rLp1118, and rMceII showed protection individually and synergistically against serovar Pomona infection, which may help us to develop a multicomponent vaccine for leptospirosis. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available