4.5 Article

Relation between rock uplift and denudation from cosmogenic nuclides in river sediment in the Central Alps of Switzerland

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2006JF000729

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A north-south traverse through the Swiss Central Alps reveals that denudation rates correlate with recent rock uplift rates in both magnitude and spatial distribution. This result emerges from a study of in situ-produced cosmogenic Be-10 in riverborne quartz in Central Alpine catchments. As a prerequisite, we took care to investigate the potential influence of shielding from cosmic rays due to snow, glaciers, and topographic obstructions; to calculate a possible memory from Last Glacial Maximum ( LGM) glaciation; and to identify a watershed size that is appropriate for systematic sampling. Mean denudation rates are 0.27 +/- 0.14 mm/ a for the Alpine foreland and 0.9 +/- 0.3 mm/ a for the crystalline Central Alps. The measured cosmogenic nuclide-derived denudation rates are in good agreement with post-LGM lake infill rates and are about twice as high as denudation rates from apatite fission track ages that record denudation from 9 to 5 Ma. In general, denudation rates are high in areas of high topography and high crustal thickness. The similarity in the spatial distribution and magnitude of denudation rates and those of rock uplift rates can be interpreted in several ways: ( 1) Postglacial rebound or climate change has introduced a transient change in which both uplift and denudation follow each other with a short lag time; ( 2) the amplitude of glacial to interglacial changes in both is small and is contained in the scatter of the data; ( 3) both are driven by ongoing convergence where their similarity might hint at some form of long-term quasi steady state; or ( 4) enhanced continuous Quaternary erosion and isostatic compensation of the mass removed accounts for the distribution of present-day rock uplift.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available