4.0 Article

In vitro assessment of axonal growth using dorsal root ganglia explants in a novel three-dimensional collagen matrix

Journal

TISSUE ENGINEERING
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 2971-2979

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ten.2007.0116

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was the development of a bioartificial nerve guide to induce axonal regeneration in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). In this in vitro study, the ability of a novel, 3-dimensional (3D), highly oriented, cross-linked porcine collagen scaffold to promote directed axonal growth has been studied. Collagen nerve guides with longitudinal guidance channels were manufactured using a series of chemical and mechanical treatments with a patented unidirectional freezing process, followed by freeze-drying (pore sizes 20-50 mu m). Hemisected rat dorsal root ganglia (DRG) were positioned such that neural and non-neural elements could migrate into the collagen scaffold. After 21 days, S100-positive Schwann cells (SCs) migrated into the scaffold and aligned within the guidance channels in a columnar fashion, resembling Bands of Bungner. Neurofilament-positive axons (mean length +/- SD 756 mu m +/- 318 mu m, maximum 1496 mu m) from DRG neurons entered the scaffold where the growth within the guidance channels was closely associated with the oriented SCs. This study confirmed the importance of SCs in the regeneration process (neurotrophic theory). The alignment of SCs within the guidance channels supported directional axonal growth (contact guidance theory). The microstructural properties of the scaffold (open, porous, longitudinal pore channels) and the in vitro data after DRG loading (axonal regeneration along migrated and columnar-aligned SCs resembling Band of Bungner) suggest that this novel oriented 3D collagen scaffold serves as a basis for future experimental regeneration studies in the PNS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available