4.1 Article

Assessment of the relationship between body weight and gastrointestinal transit times measured by use of a wireless motility capsule system in dogs

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 71, Issue 8, Pages 898-902

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.71.8.898

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nestle-Purina

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To assess the relationship between body weight and gastrointestinal transit times measured by use of a wireless motility capsule (WMC) system in healthy dogs. Animals-31 healthy adult dogs that weighed between 19.6 and 81.2 kg. Procedures-Food was withheld overnight. The following morning, a WMC was orally administered to each dog, and each dog was then fed a test meal that provided a fourth of the daily energy requirements. A vest was fitted on each dog to hold a receiver that collected and stored data from the WMC. Measurements were obtained with each dog in its home environment. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between body weight and gastrointestinal transit times. Results-Gastric emptying time (GET) ranged from 405 to 897 minutes, small bowel transit time (SBTT) ranged from 96 to 224 minutes, large bowel transit time (LBTT) ranged from 427 to 2,573 minutes, and total transit time (TTT) ranged from 1,294 to 3,443 minutes. There was no positive relationship between body weight and gastrointestinal transit times. A nonlinear inverse relationship between body weight and GET and between body weight and SBTT best fit the data. The LBTT could not be explained by this model and likely influenced the poor fit for the TTT. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-A positive relationship did not exist between body weight and gastrointestinal transit times. Dogs with the lowest body weight of the cohort appeared to have longer gastric and small intestinal transit times than did large- and giant-breed dogs. (Am J Vet Res 2010;71:898-902)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available