4.1 Article

Effects of administration of caffeine on metabolic variables in neonatal pigs with peripartum asphyxia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 71, Issue 10, Pages 1214-1219

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.71.10.1214

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia, Mexico (CONACYT) [165101]
  2. Mexico's Sistema Nacional de lnvestigadores

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To determine effects of 2 doses of caffeine on metabolic variables in neonatal pigs with peripartum asphyxia. Animals-180 neonatal pigs. Procedures-Neonatal pigs were assigned to 2 groups (groups P and F) on the basis of results for a vitality scale (passed or failed, respectively). Within each group, there were 3 subgroups of 30 pigs each. Within each group, the 3 subgroups received a placebo that consisted of an empty gelatin capsule, a gelatin capsule that contained 20 mg of caffeine, and a gelatin capsule that contained 35 mg of caffeine, respectively; all capsules were administered orally (0 hours). Blood samples were collected immediately before and 24 hours after capsule administration. Results-Pigs in groups P and F that received 20 or 35 mg of caffeine had significant increases in triglyceride concentrations. All pigs in groups P and F had a significant decrease in lactate concentrations, although the placebo-treated pigs in group F had larger decreases than did the group F pigs treated with 20 or 35 mg of caffeine. Glucose concentrations increased significantly in group F pigs treated with 20 or 35 mg of caffeine (30% and 50%, respectively), whereas glucose concentrations remained unchanged in group P pigs. In pigs treated with 35 mg of caffeine, the final weight obtained for group F was approximately 8% lower than that obtained for group P Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Administering caffeine immediately after birth to neonatal pigs with severe oxygen restriction resulted in significant improvements in metabolic variables. (Am J Vet Res 2010;71:1214-1219)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available