4.5 Article

Aligned electrospun nanofibers specify the direction of dorsal root ganglia neurite growth

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
Volume 83A, Issue 3, Pages 636-645

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31285

Keywords

regeneration; dorsal root ganglia; polylactate axon; orientation

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [1 K08 EB03996] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS36778, N01-NS-1-2338, NS38849] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [T32 NSO7222] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nerve injury, a significant cause of disability, may be treated more effectively using nerve guidance channels containing longitudinally aligned fibers. Aligned, electrospun nanofibers direct the neurite growth of immortalized neural stem cells, demonstrating potential for directing regenerating neurites. However, no study of neurite guidance on these fibers has yet been performed with primary neurons. Here, we examined neurites from dorsal root ganglia explants on electrospun poly-L-lactate nanofibers of high, intermediate, and random alignment. On aligned fibers, neurites grew radially outward from the ganglia and turned to follow the fibers upon contact. Neurite guidance was robust, with neurites never leaving the fibers to grow on the surrounding cover slip. To compare the alignment of neurites to that of the nanofiber substrates, Fourier methods were used to quantify the alignment. Neurite alignment, however striking, was inferior to fiber alignment on all but the randomly aligned fibers. Neurites on highly aligned substrates were 20 and 16% longer than neurites on random and intermediate fibers, respectively. Schwann cells on fibers assumed a very narrow morphology compared to those on the surrounding coverslip. The robust neurite guidance demonstrated here is a significant step toward the use of aligned, electrospun nanofibers for nerve regeneration. (C) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available