4.7 Article

So many correlated tests, so little time!: Rapid adjustment of P values for multiple correlated tests

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages 1158-1168

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/522036

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 HG000040] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [T32 HG000040, R01 HG000376, HG00376] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Contemporary genetic association studies may test hundreds of thousands of genetic variants for association, often with multiple binary and continuous traits or under more than one model of inheritance. Many of these association tests may be correlated with one another because of linkage disequilibrium between nearby markers and correlation between traits and models. Permutation tests and simulation-based methods are often employed to adjust groups of correlated tests for multiple testing, since conventional methods such as Bonferroni correction are overly conservative when tests are correlated. We present here a method of computing P values adjusted for correlated tests (P-ACT) that attains the accuracy of permutation or simulation-based tests in much less computation time, and we show that our method applies to many common association tests that are based on multiple traits, markers, and genetic models. Simulation demonstrates that P-ACT attains the power of permutation testing and provides a valid adjustment for hundreds of correlated association tests. In data analyzed as part of the Finland-United States Investigation of NIDDM Genetics (FUSION) study, we observe a near one-to-one relationship (r(2) > .999) between P-ACT and the corresponding permutation-based P values, achieving the same precision as permutation testing but thousands of times faster.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available