4.7 Article

Anatomical patterning of visceral adipose tissue: Race, sex, and age variation

Journal

OBESITY
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages 2984-2993

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2007.356

Keywords

abdominal obesity; adults; body composition; body fat distribution; magnetic resonance

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL069995, R01-HL69995] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD12252, R01 HD012252] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK064870-05, R01-DK064870, R01 DK064391, R01 DK064870, R01-DK 064391] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: We tested sex, race, and age differences in the patterning of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue. Research Methods and Procedures: Contiguous 1-cm-thick magnetic resonance (MR) images of the abdomen were collected from 820 African-American and white adults. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to examine the effects of image location, sex, race, and age (>= 50 vs. <50 years) on adipose tissue areas. Maximum VAT area was identified for each subject from the raw data. Results: Compared to women, men had greater total VAT volume (p < 0.0001), and their maximum VAT area occurred higher in the abdomen (p < 0.0001). Among white men, maximim VAT area most frequently occurred 5 to 10 cm above L4-L5, whereas in the other groups, maximim VAT area most frequently occurred 1 to 4 cm above L4-L5 (p < 0.0001). African-American men had greater total VAT volume than African-American women (p < 0.01), but this sex difference was only significant using single images cranial to L4-L5 + 2 cm. Age-related increases in VAT tended to be greatest 5 to 10 cm above L4-L5 in men and near L4-L5 in women. Discussion: A single MR image 5 to 10 cm above L4-L5 may allow more accurate conclusions than the L4-L5 image regarding group differences in visceral adiposity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available