4.6 Article

Racial/Ethnic differences in the development of disability among older adults

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages 2209-2215

Publisher

AMER PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.106047

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [P60-AR48098, P60 AR048098, P60 AR048098-010003] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01-HD45412, R01 HD045412-02, R01 HD045412] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. We investigated differences in the development of disability in activities of daily living among non-Hispanic Whites, African Americans, Hispanics interviewed in Spanish, and Hispanics interviewed in English. Methods. We estimated 6-year risk for disability development among 8161 participants 65 years or older and free of baseline disability. We evaluated mediating factors amenable to clinical and public health intervention on racial/ethnic difference. Results. The risk for developing disability among Hispanics interviewed in English was similar to that among Whites (hazard ratio [HR]=0.99; 95% confidence interval [Cl]=0.6, 1.4) but was substantially higher among African Americans (HR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.3, 1.9) and Hispanics interviewed in Spanish (HR = 1.8; 95% Cl = 1.4, 2.1). Adjustment for demographics, health, and socioeconomic status reduced a large portion of those disparities (African American adjusted HR=1.1, Spanish-interviewed Hispanic adjusted HR = 1.2). Conclusions. Higher risks for developing disability among older African Americans, and Hispanics interviewed in Spanish compared with Whites were largely attenuated by health and socioeconomic differences. Language- and culture-specific programs to increase physical activity and promote weight maintenance may reduce rates of disability in activities of daily living and reduce racial/ethnic disparities in disability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available