4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Arm crank ergometry and shoulder pain in persons with spinal cord injury

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 88, Issue 12, Pages 1727-1729

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.043

Keywords

exercise; rehabilitation; shoulder pain; spinal cord injuries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine whether a primary fitness program utilizing arm crank ergometry would cause increased shoulder pain in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: Cohort study. Setting: Clinical research center. Participants: People (N=23) with chronic SCI (>1y) who were participating in a weight loss study to compare the effectiveness of diet only (1000kcal/d for 12wk) versus diet with arm crank ergometry (1000kcal/d and arm crank ergometry 3 times a week for 12wk). Intervention: Arm crank ergometry. Main Outcome Measure: Changes in shoulder pain intensity using the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). Results: After adjusting for baseline scores, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups on postintervention WUSPI scores (F-1,F-20 =.85, P=.37,partial eta(2) =.04). The strength of the relationship between group assignment (diet only vs diet and arm crank ergometry) and final WUSPI score 2 was weak, as assessed by a partial 71, with group assignment accounting for 4% of the variance on the WUSPI. The adjusted means were lower in the diet and arm crank ergometry group (mean, 7.84) than in the diet only group (mean, 12.22); however, these differences did not appear to be clinically significant. Conclusions: A primary fitness program using arm crank ergometry does not increase shoulder pain in people with SCI who use wheelchairs. Further investigation with a larger group and what constitutes clinically significant changes on the WUSPI is warranted to confirm our results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available