4.6 Article

Immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in HIV-1 infected liver and kidney transplant recipients

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 2816-2820

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02007.x

Keywords

dose modification; HIV; immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics; kidney transplantation; liver transplantation

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U01 AI052748-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [M01 00079] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Solid organ transplantation in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals requiring concomitant use of immunosuppressants (IS) (e.g. cyclosporine [CsA], sirolimus [SrL], tacrolimus [FK]) and antiretrovirals (ARVs) (e.g. protease inhibitors [PIs] and/or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [NNRTIs]) is complicated by significant drug interactions. To assist in appropriate clinical management, we describe the pharmacokinetics and dosing modifications in 35 patients (20 kidney, 13 liver and two kidney-liver HIV-infected subjects with end-stage kidney or liver disease), on both IS and NNRTIs, PIs, and combined NNRTIs + PIs, in studies done at weeks 2-4 and/or 12 weeks after transplantation or after a change in IS or ARV drug regimen (n = 97 studies). CsA, SrL and FK concentrations were measured in whole blood by LC/MS. HIV-infected transplant recipients using PIs with IS had marked increases in CsA, FK or SrL trough levels compared to those on NNRTIs alone or to patients not on ARVs, necessitating either a reduction in dose or an increase in dosing interval. Subjects on efavirenz (EFV) and CsA required much higher doses of CsA than those using any other ARV. Changes in antiretroviral therapy should be carefully managed to avoid insufficient immunosuppression or toxicity due to drug interactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available